July 6, 2018 at 9:32 am #59915MaxKeymasterThis review popped up on Amazon. There are currently 42 reviews up on Amazon.com since the Manual was published in March. 93% are 5 star, and 7% are 4 star. I have no idea who the author of this review is, or even if he participates in the MVT universe of blog or forum, and whether or not he will see what I have posted this here. I picked to post this review because:
- Yes, it is a positive 5 star review.
- It comes from a position of some authority as the authors is “a regular U.S. army armor officer and a lifetime of fascination with tactics and military affairs.”
- It includes frank criticism which will allow me to comment.
- I believe that it gives the manual due credit for being what it is, simply the best small unit tactics manual out there. I wrote it like that for a reason. I don’t care about the Ranger Handbook – this Manual is specifically NOT THE RANGER HANDBOOK
5.0 out of 5 stars The best single tactical primer for small units in print. Buy, Read, and Learn.By ‘a reader’ on July 4, 2018Format: Kindle Edition|Verified Purchase
Bottom line up front, this is the best tactical manual for small infantry units you can buy. While it may not be perfect, it is as close as you are going to find, at least until the author puts out his next book.
I base this evaluation on having served as a regular U.S. army armor officer and a lifetime of fascination with tactics and military affairs. The author covers nearly all of the topics I would expect for preparation and training of a small infantry unit. (There are one or two exceptions, but they are not enough to change my rating. Rather, they are simply a reflection of the fact that no one volume can cover everything about small unit tactics, but this one comes very close.) The initial chapter on individual skills is really just an outline, but that is perfectly acceptable as the purpose of the book is not to teach those skills, and the outline serves to identify what the book assumes you know or will learn to implement the rest of the book. The remainder of the book is a first class explanation of good small unit tactics based on U.S. doctrine, U.K. doctrine, and some items which are not official doctrine but are clearly the result of experience. The primary tactical tasks covered include what I expected, attack, defense, patrolling, CQB, tactical vehicle movement, and military decision making (doctrine, situational assessment, planning/order process). The explanations are, for the material covered, short and well written prose with appropriate diagrams and bullet points/checklists mixed in. Page for page, this book explains more of small unit tactics better than any official manual I have read. The chapter on patrols is particularly good, and is far more likely to be understood by those without prior military training on the subject than the parallel material in the Ranger Handbook or most military manuals.
Now for a bit of nitpicking and what this tactical manual isn’t. I do have a few observations about how I think the Tactical Manual could be improved. First, the military decision making process information is buried towards the end of the book, it should be covered first. Second, the treatment of the METTC mission assessment and the OCOKA terrain analysis is not the strongest I have seen. The weakest part of this is the obstacles discussion. The book works on the general assumption that a squad, or at most a platoon, is operating according to its guidance. While that size unit will not generally create large obstacles on its own, even relatively small obstacles can be critical in the defense. Likewise, a better understanding of obstacles is needed to mount successful attacks around or through enemy obstacles. Third, the CQB chapter acknowledges that it is really more of an aide memoire for those who have attended a Max Velocity class. Unlike the rest of the book, which is geared towards those attending his classes, but is also very informative for those who have not, it is simply not a very useful standalone explanation. (see note*)
As with all books on tactics, you should not rely on just one if you can help it. (If, however, I was only allowed one reference to take with me to train a small unit, this would be the one volume I would take with me.) I recommend reading this one and several others to work through the weaknesses I noted and to gain context. Sweat saves blood. That includes the mental sweat of reading and learning from the experience and knowledge of others.
*Note 1: This is an interesting comment. I would be willing to guess that the author of the review has no familiarity with current CQB TTPs. When I wrote what he identifies as an acknowledgement that the CQB chapter is more of an aide memoire, it is true that I did that, but I then went to put far more detail in the chapter than I initially intended. I note that the reviewer had the kindle edition, and I am sure this is not an ideal format in which to review and reference the extensive diagrams in the book. This may have detracted – I recommend the paper version, even if you want the kindle as a handy reference.Thus what I ended up doing was going to the effort of writing about and diagramming current CQB TTPs. These are as taught on the MVT CQBC. This was more than I intended to do, in a desire to make the manual as complete as possible. But here we hit the issue: there is only so much you can learn about these techniques through reading in a manual however extensive the diagrams. And even if you understand the theory, it cannot be translated to reality without practical training. This is why the CQBC is a mind-blower for many. This fact is also true for much of the rest of the book. I am sure that there are many arm-chair tacticians out there who look at tactics as a study from afar, but do not practice. For these guys, it is an academic study. If you are interested in building the whole warrior, you need to actually train in theses TTPs. CQBC is perhaps the best example, but you cannot conduct fire and maneuver with effective shoot, move and communication, unless you have actually trained it. Once you move beyond academic theory and observation, you have to train to be able to do it with any effect. Patrol? Ambush? Raid? Live fire? Forget it. This is why MVT exists, to bring you both the theory and practice of these arts.Thus, there is only so much I can do with CQB in written / diagrammatic form, as with much of the rest of the manual. I can detail TTPs, but to actually be able to perform them, you need to train. Then, the manual becomes a handy reference to prevent skill fade as you go forward.July 6, 2018 at 10:34 am #59918BrushpopperParticipant
Good review, and a great response back to his CQB comments. I’m still reading on my manual, trying to absorb it all, but will definitely have to go back through it again, and again.
~ Little - South Texas
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.