February 15, 2016 at 12:40 pm #24725Ronald BealParticipant
(U//FOUO) This Joint Intelligence Bulletin (JIB) is intended to provide information on the recent arrest of 11 domestic extremists for conspiracy to impede officers of the United States from discharging their official duties through force, intimidation, or threats, in violation of 18 USC §372. This JIB is provided by the FBI and DHS to support their respective activities and to assist federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government counterterrorism and law enforcement officials in deterring, preventing, or disrupting terrorist attacks against the United States. As in any criminal case, defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.
(U) Circumstances Leading to the Arrests
(U) On 26 January 2016, the FBI and Oregon State Police initiated a probable cause arrest of domestic extremists associated with an illegal armed occupation of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge (MNWR) in Harney County, Oregon.
» (U) The FBI and Oregon State Police initially arrested five militia and sovereign citizen extremists on 26 January during a traffic stop north of Burns.*,† The five are identified as: Ammon E. BundyUSPER, Ryan C. BundyUSPER, Brian CavalierUSPER, Shawna CoxUSPER, and Ryan W. PayneUSPER. During the arrest action, shots were fired by the Oregon State Police, resulting in the death of Robert LaVoy FinicumUSPER, according to official information.
» (U) Militia extremists Joseph D. O’ShaughnessyUSPER and Peter SantilliUSPER were later arrested in Burns, and militia extremist Jon E. RitzheimerUSPER surrendered to authorities in Peoria, Arizona for their roles in the illegal occupation, according to official information.
» (U//LES) Militia extremists Dylan W. AndersonUSPER, Duane EhmerUSPER, and Jason PatrickUSPER were arrested on 27 January after leaving the MNWR and surrendering to the FBI, according to law enforcement information.
(U) All 11 individuals face federal felony charges of conspiracy to impede officers of the United States from discharging their official duties through force, intimidation, or threats, in violation of 18 USC §372, according to official information.
(U//LES) Multiple sources with varying levels of access reported on 2 January 2016 that Ammon Bundy and Payne led a group of armed individuals—who later self-identified as the Citizens for Constitutional Freedom (CCF)USPER—to seize the MNWR, located approximately 30 miles south of Burns. Over the next 25 days, group leaders and a growing number of armed supporters made repeated demands that the US Government turn over federally owned property located in Harney County to the CCF for supposed redistribution to local residents. Group leaders simultaneously sought to expand their illegal action to other federal sites in the West.
(U//LES) Following news of the arrests, some individuals peacefully departed from the MNWR, but reporting as of 28 January 2016 indicates that a small group of armed individuals continue to illegally occupy the site, despite requests to leave made by law enforcement and public officials. In response to news of the arrests, some militia extremists and their supporters have called for violence or unspecified nationwide action against law enforcement, federal facilities, and US government employees.
(U) Possible Indicators of Planned Domestic Extremist Violence
(U//FOUO) In light of these threats and because the CCF had been urging local residents to occupy other federal facilities, the FBI and DHS urge recipients of this bulletin to use caution during encounters with suspected domestic extremists, and to be vigilant of potential surveillance or pre-operational indicators. Some of these behavioral indicators may be constitutionally protected activities and should be supported by additional facts to justify increased suspicions.
(U//FOUO) No single behavioral indicator should be the sole basis for law enforcement action; rather the totality of behavioral indicators and other relevant circumstances should be evaluated when considering any law enforcement response or action. Independently, each behavioral indicator may represent legitimate recreational or commercial activities. Multiple indicators, however, could suggest a threat.
» (U//FOUO) New or increased advocacy of violence in response to the recent events in Oregon—such as vows to avenge the death that occurred during the enforcement action;
» (U//FOUO) Evidence of planned travel to Oregon—possibly as part of a group—to engage in violence in support of the individuals still present at the MNWR;
» (U//FOUO) Discussing plans to initiate violent confrontations or armed standoffs against federal entities, similar to the recent Oregon occupation;
» (U//FOUO) Use of cover terms to mask the true meaning of events or illegal activities combined with active advocacy of violence;
» (U//FOUO) Demonstrating an unusual interest in or unusual questions about security procedures, or engaging in overtly suspicious actions to provoke and observe responses by security or law enforcement officers;
» (U//FOUO) Demonstrating an unusual interest in building or site entry points, such as peak days and hours of operation, or in security personnel, surveillance assets (including cameras), or access controls (e.g., alarms, barriers, doors, gates, or locks);
» (U//FOUO) Demonstrating an unusual interest in site security reaction drills or procedures; causing multiple false alarms or fictitious emergency calls to the same locations or similar venues;
» (U//FOUO) Loitering, parking, or standing in the same area over multiple days with no reasonable explanation;
» (U//FOUO) Unusual interest in speaking with building maintenance personnel or security guards;
» (U//FOUO) Attention to or avoidance of surveillance cameras;
» (U//FOUO) Interest without justification in obtaining site plans, ingress and egress routes, and information on employees or the public;
Travelling the world... Home is Nashville, TNFebruary 15, 2016 at 7:15 pm #24747AndrewParticipant
They sure like those predjudicial words such as extremist.February 15, 2016 at 8:16 pm #24749tangoParticipant
“Independently, each behavioral indicator may represent legitimate recreational or commercial activities. Multiple indicators, however, could suggest a threat.”
Don’t be trying to knowingly exercise more than 1 constitutionally supported right at a time!
Somebody has IFF’d on you. Hopefully you don’t need any more motivation than that.
Weak Men can't be virtuous. - JBPFebruary 16, 2016 at 9:27 am #24764janeParticipant
This bulletin says a lot about the current state of the FBI. The word “extremist” denotes a thought crime…. i.e. “extreme views” – who gets to define this? Using this politically charged keyword is designed to dehumanize and vilify those people who hold certain views as enemies of the state, rather than objectively convey information.
It’s not a stretch that with minor modification, this could have come from Kim Jong Un. Just put the word “dog” behind “extremist”, and you are there.
What would the founders of this country think about the above bulletin? After all, General Gage designated them as “extremists” as well.February 16, 2016 at 10:31 am #24769EricParticipant
This is how they control the narrative over the airwaves.
It is also how we have come to a point where up is down, black is white, bitter is sweet, and darkness is light. Everything is upside down because of shit like what is written in that bulletin.
"I have sworn upon the altar of god eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man"
Thomas JeffersonFebruary 16, 2016 at 10:39 am #24770SeanTModerator
“militia and sovereign citizen extremists”
Anyone find a US Federal LEGAL definition of the above label?February 16, 2016 at 11:41 am #24775janeParticipant
I don’t think these are “legal” definitions, but they are definitions that the current administration came up with: http://constitution.org/abus/dhs/hsra-domestic-extremismlexicon_165213935473.pdfFebruary 16, 2016 at 2:56 pm #24780SeanTModerator
Thanks for the link Jane.
pretty sure everyone is some form of extremist according to those definitions that use their other definitions in their definitions….
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.